Archive for the ‘Attorney advice/commentary’ Category

If you are pulled over…

Wednesday, June 4th, 2008

One of the most interesting aspects of my job as a New York traffic ticket lawyer is the fact that just about anyone, no matter where they live, what they do or how much money they have, may ask for assistance or advice at some point. Traffic tickets, driver license suspension, points on a driver license—these are issues that don’t discriminate and issues any of us may have to deal with from time to time.

The majority of people ask me what to do after they’ve received a traffic ticket. While there is clearly much to be said about that, this article is instead for those who may want some advice on how to avoid getting a traffic ticket in the first place.

I usually tell people it’s pretty simple. First, don’t get pulled over. Drive carefully in every sense of the phrase and the odds of receiving a ticket will drop dramatically. Sounds obvious, but it’s a simple first step that’s often overlooked—people I talk to seem to want to attribute being pulled over for speeding to everything other than the fact that they might actually have been speeding.

If you are pulled over, do not assume you are being issued a traffic ticket. While I have no official statistics, casual conversation with the police officers I’ve dealt with over the years suggests that maybe 25% or more of car stops do not result in a traffic citation. Perhaps it’s a minor equipment malfunction or other issue that will simply result in a warning or perhaps the officer is just in a good mood. My advice is to talk, act and think as if there is still a chance that you can avoid being issued a traffic ticket (because there is).

With that in mind, here is what you can do (or not do) or say (or not say) after you are pulled over but before you are issued a traffic ticket that may help you avoid being charged with a traffic violation.

  • Take a deep breath and don’t panic. If the officer is directing you to pull over, use your signal if you need to change lanes or direction of travel. Look for a safe place to stop but also look to stop as quickly as possible. You don’t want the officer thinking “this person has no idea how to drive” while approaching your vehicle simply because you had a momentary lapse in reason once you saw the sirens behind you.
  • Avoid moving around while waiting for the officer to approach your vehicle. The officer’s first task is to ensure his own safety. If he thinks you are trying to hide something (weapons, drugs) he could become agitated. Keep your hands on the wheel and stay still.
  • Keep your seatbelt on. Yes, you know the officer will ask for your license and registration. Wait until he asks and then unbuckle your belt and reach for these items. First, by avoiding unnecessary movement, you are less likely to make the officer nervous. Second, you’re not tempting the officer to issue you a seatbelt summons—let him see that you were wearing it all along.
  • Be polite. Maybe the officer was just going to warn you about some minor equipment failure he noticed. Don’t give him a reason to turn that warning into a summons. Moreover, officers tend to have better recollection of cases where there was some confrontation on the road. When it comes time to deal with the officer later, you don’t want to stand out as a motorist who gave him a hard time.
  • If you have a PBA card or other document or information which you feel might discourage the officer from issuing a summons, use it wisely. Don’t shove it in an officer’s face as soon as he gets to your window. Be polite, and while you are giving him the paperwork he requested you can show or tell him why he may want to reconsider and why you are sorry. If you are mentioning an officer in particular, know which town or precinct he’s in and be prepared to explain your relationship.
  • Know where your paperwork is. Your insurance and registration and driver license should all be readily available. If you don’t have something or can’t find it, now you are essentially asking the officer to give you two warnings (one for the underlying reason for the car stop and one for the missing paperwork). The odds of the officer letting two violations go will naturally be less than the odds of the officer letting one violation go.

Some officers are going to issue the traffic ticket no matter what you do. However, it’s certainly worth doing whatever you can to maximize the chances that you will drive away with a mere warning.

If you are ultimately issued a traffic ticket, my advice is to talk to a local traffic ticket lawyer. A good traffic ticket attorney will simplify your situation and let you know what options are available to you. Different people have different needs, different driving records, different potential consequences, etc. Everyone’s situation is a little different and everyone can benefit from knowing what they are facing after a traffic violation summons has been issued. Most attorneys offer some kind of a free consultation and I’ll always recommend pursuing that option first and foremost so you can make educated decisions going forward.

By Scott Feifer
Feifer & Greenberg, LLP
NYTicketHELP.com / TicketHELP.com

Speed deterrents

Thursday, May 29th, 2008

Speeding tickets, speeding violations, speeding citations, speeding summonses; No matter the name, they are all more or less the same thing. They are all evidence that a police officer believes an individual was exceeding the speed limit.

What happens, however, when the conversation turns to how to prevent individuals from speeding in the first place? Cynics among us will argue that no one has an interest in reducing the number of people speeding. They will argue that the only focus is on issuing more tickets and generating more fine revenue. While that might be true in some instances, there are certainly a very large number of people from different segments of society who are genuinely interested in safety and reducing the number of speeders on the road.

Measuring the number of people who exceed speed limits on our roadways is not as simple as counting the number of speeding traffic tickets that are issued. Sometimes, the increase in speeding summonses is attributable to an increase in the number of officers enforcing the speed limit or an increased effort (crackdown?) by the existing enforcement officers. Consider a situation where 2 out of 10 people speeding are issued speeding tickets on one day and 4 out of 10 people speeding are issued speeding tickets the next day. The number of speeding tickets issued has doubled but the number of individuals exceeding the speed limit is exactly the same. Speeding tickets measure the number of people caught and not the number of people who were actually speeding.

The difficulties in measuring aside, debates on how to best reduce the number of individuals who exceed the speed limit continue in communities around the country. Focus is generally on:

Increased speed enforcement. An increase in enforcement works in two ways. More enforcement generally means more speeding summonses issued and more speeding tickets today should lead to more cautious drivers tomorrow. In addition, the simple visual of more enforcement officers on the road (and fear of receiving a speeding summons) is likely to cause more people to slow down and obey the speed limit. The arguments against increased speed enforcement include the costs involved, removal of enforcement officers from situations where they could be preventing more serious crimes and a public relations backlash (people will assume increased enforcement is about revenue generation even if it is truly in place for safety purposes).

Increased speeding ticket fines. Some argue that if people were more worried about the direct costs associated with receiving a traffic ticket that they would slow down. While very large increases may serve that purpose, it’s unlikely that such large increases would ever be approved. Instead, opponents say that if the existing fines, surcharges and potential insurance increases are not enough of an incentive to slow down another $50 or $100 or even $250 is unlikely to make a difference. Moreover, there is a public relations issue similar to what we see with increased enforcement as many are likely to view an increase in fines as more about revenue generation than about public safety.

Physical speed controls. While not really an option on highways, many local communities consider controls like speed bumps and more stop signs to be the answer. These serve to physically prevent individuals from speeding. While it is unlikely that anyone will argue that these controls are about revenue generation more than safety, opposition does exist. Certain controls like speed bumps can be controversial because of the damage they can cause to cars. The issue of who is liable comes into play and it’s a headache some communities look to avoid.

As long as there are speed limits there will be drivers who continue to exceed the speed limit. Enforcement officials are presented with the challenge of walking a fine line—control speeding while avoiding the appearance they are motivated by money, not safety. As automobile safety evolves and the technological war between speed enforcement and speed detection rages on, this same issue of how to get people to slow down is likely to exist throughout it all.

By Scott Feifer
Feifer & Greenberg, LLP
NYTicketHELP.com / TicketHELP.com