News / Commentary
Welcome to TicketHELP.com News and Commentary Thursday, March 4th, 2010
Thank you for checking out our News and Commentary section.
TicketHELP.com is considered a premier source for nationwide traffic ticket information–a place to “find attorneys, get answers and discuss and learn about traffic tickets and driving related matters”.
Our News and Commentary section will be updated regularly. Our intention is to create a large, useful collection of advice and information concerning driving, law enforcement on our roadways, the relevant legal systems and issues and how the current economy potentially affects all of this.
We welcome comments on any of our posts.
Motives for a new crackdown in Detroit questioned Thursday, March 4th, 2010
The Detroit News reports that recent correspondence from a top police department commander in Detroit, Michigan has angered civil-rights activists. An e-mail message was sent and it promised to discipline Detroit police officers who don’t write enough traffic tickets.
First, critics argue this simply amounts to a quota system. There may be no official “number” of tickets mentioned, but it’s a reasonable conclusion that whatever police officials consider to be “enough” tickets essentially constitutes the quota.
Second, the traffic ticket push is connected to a campaign by the department to crack down on moving violations in high-crime areas of the city and at the same time check the drivers for warrants and weapons. Residents are complaining that there is now overly aggressive policing where, for years, officers on patrol overlooked many minor violations such as a broken taillight. Residents and civil-rights leaders are concerned that using traffic stops to search for warrants, etc. simply encourages racial profiling of drivers.
While police officials will always argue that they have every right to pull over any motorist the see commit any violation of any size, their motives for these increased car stops are certainly worth questioning.
Submitted by NY traffic lawyers
Feifer & Greenberg, LLP
Alabama judge unfairly imposes jail time for a speeding ticket Friday, February 26th, 2010
A woman attended traffic court in Dothan, Alabama earlier this week to contest a speeding ticket. She was found guilty. She was sentenced to 10 days in jail.
Stacie Flowers Rae certainly wasn’t expecting jail time when she made the decision to contest her Alabama speeding ticket. She claims District Judge John Steensland sentenced her to jail for the speeding charge in order to send a message to the rest of the people in traffic court Thursday who planned to contest their tickets.
Rae said she was handcuffed and placed near the front of the courtroom while Steensland heard other cases. Based on what she saw, she felt the Judge’s intimidation strategy worked. She was the first bench trial of the day and she watched others who originally seemed intent on contesting their charge as she did enter a plea of guilty instead.
Her last piece of evidence convincing her that she was used as a prop to scare the other motorists? At the end of the court session, the judge reduced her sentence to fines and court costs. Court records indicate Rae was found guilty of speeding at 9:38 a.m. and sentenced to 10 days in jail. At 11:17 a.m., her sentence was changed to zero days in jail. Her total fines and court costs were $209.
Steensland says he did it because she was “lying”. Maybe she was (we’ll never know) but the fact that she was the first case of the day, sentenced to jail time and left to stand handcuffed in front of the rest of the motorists only to see her sentence reduced once the other motorists finished their cases seems a little suspicious.
While Steensland denies the original sentence was an intimidation tactic, he ultimately issued an apology. Bottom line is no one should ever be discouraged from having their day in court. The odds may be stacked against a typical traffic violation defendant, but at very least everyone should have a chance to contest the charges against them without fear of minor court surcharges to cover the extra time a hearing takes or penalties, such as imprisonment, that are way more severe than the penalties given to similarly charged motorists who enter a guilty plea.
Scott Feifer
NYC Traffic Ticket Lawyer
Larry Fitzgerald photo radar tickets dismissed Wednesday, February 24th, 2010
Arizona Cardinals wide receiver Larry Fitzgerald “received” quite a bit of publicity recently for the five photo-radar tickets issued in his name.
Four of those five tickets have now been dismissed by motions of either the prosecutor or arresting officer. While it may not be entirely clear from these pictures as posted here, four of the drivers were simply not Larry Fitzgerald.
These ticket dismissals show the risk law enforcement runs when they choose to replace live officer traffic enforcement with automated enforcement methods. A photograph cannot automatically determine the name and pedigree information of driver. The best a state can do is issue the ticket to the registered owner of the vehicle and then make a choice–either prosecute as a parking ticket, where the ID of the actual driver is of no consequence, or try to prosecute as a moving violation but run the risk it will be dismissed if the registered owner named on the ticket was not the actual driver of the vehicle.
This was a good example where prosecuting as a moving violation didn’t work out.
Getting burned by Larry Fitzgerald’s speed is nothing new – we see it every football Sunday. Getting burned by his friends speed, however, is another story altogether.
Chicago speeding tickets-new online option. Friday, January 29th, 2010
If you’ve been issued a Cook County speeding ticket or other traffic ticket, you can now pay or request a court hearing online.
Previously, anyone who received a speeding ticket or similar violation would have to either deal with payment or scheduling via mail or in person at one of the Clerk’s district locations.
All such services are a welcome convenience. Individuals can now respond to their traffic violations without worry about whether anything sent by mail was received and/or properly processed and without having to come in person and wait on line to perform a simple transaction.
A couple of things to note. First, the Clerk does charge a $5 fee per ticket for the convenience of using this website to pay your violations this way. In addition, you must be 18 years or older. Finally, it must be a “Court Diversion” ticket (one where a personal appearance is not required).
The website handles the following violations:
- Failure to wear a seat belt
- U-turn in intersection
- Failure to stop at a stop sign
- Disobey turn signal indicator
- Failure to yield to pedestrian in crosswalk
- Improper right turn
- Turn on red prohibited